Go to Your State
Select a state/territory
Search
Toggle Site Navigation
Make a Donation

Chandler, AZ

84
How we calculate the Chandler ParkScore® Ranking

The ranking for Chandler is based on how it compares nationally on five characteristics of an excellent park system: acreage, access, investment, amenities, and equity.

Download Chandler’s ParkScore Report

See Methodology

See the Map

Acreage
42 pts
Access
50 pts
Investment
14 pts
Amenities
37 pts
Equity
61 pts
Chandler, Arizona city image
62% of Chandler residents live within a 10-minute walk of a park.
Median City, 100 most populous U.S. cities: 74%
Median City, all urban cities and towns in U.S.: 55%

We’re working to ensure that every person, in every neighborhood, in every city across America has a quality park within a 10-minute walk of home.

See Our Work in Arizona
Chandler residents who live within a 10-minute walk of a park
The average distance most people are willing to walk to reach a destination is 10-minutes or roughly half a mile. The 10-minute walk standard helps us examine the availability of parks close to home.
By Age (%)
Children (0 - 19)
64
Adults (20 - 64)
63
Seniors (65+)
55
By Income (%)
High Income
60
Middle Income
62
Low Income
62
By Race/Ethnicity (%)
Native American*
65
Asian*
57
Black*
64
Hispanic
68
Pacific Islander*
64
White*
60
2 or More Races*
63
Other*
63
*Excludes those who report Hispanic origin (which is captured separately from race by the U.S. Census).
Comparing amount of park space between neighborhoods by race/ethnicity
Across the country, parks located in neighborhoods with a majority of residents of color are half the size of parks in predominantly white neighborhoods yet serve five times more people per acre, according to TPL park equity data. In Chandler, residents in neighborhoods of color* have access to 8% more park space per person than the city’s average neighborhood and 15% more than those in white neighborhoods. Additionally, we compared park space in the city’s average neighborhood with others by specific race and ethnicity:
*Neighborhoods of color are defined as those in Chandler with the highest concentrations of people who identify as Black, Hispanic, Indigenous and Native American, Asian American, Pacific Islander, multiple races, or other communities of color (more information).
Comparing amount of park space between neighborhoods by income
Across the country, parks serving low-income households are four times smaller yet serve four times more people per acre than parks serving high-income households, according to TPL park equity data. In Chandler, residents in low-income neighborhoods have access to 7% less park space per person than those in the average Chandler neighborhood and 6% less than those in high-income neighborhoods.
4% of Chandler’s land is used for parks and recreation.
National median 15%
How do park amenities measure up?
Parks help foster healthy, inclusive, and flourishing communities—the cities with the highest ParkScore ratings are healthier places to live. These six amenities reflect activities popular among a diverse selection of user groups (kids, teenagers, adults, seniors). For each amenity, Chandler is awarded points based on their abundance relative to the other 99 cities.
Basketball Hoops
34/100pts
3.2 per 10,000 people
Playgrounds
54/100pts
3.5 per 10,000 people
Rec & Senior Centers
24/100pts
0.5 per 20,000 people
Dog Parks
48/100pts
1.4 per 100,000 people
Bathrooms
27/100pts
1 per 10,000 people
Splashpads
33/100pts
1.1 per 100,000 people
How much is Chandler investing in parks?
We compared Chandler with the other 100 most populous cities in the nation on total park investment per person, aggregating all public and private spending for any publicly accessible park in the city. Visit our City Park Facts database to see how the other big cities stack up.
Park Investment (Three-Year Average)
  • City agency
    $64 (98%)
  • Other public agencies
    $0 (%)
  • Private organizations
    $0 (%)
  • Monetized volunteer hours
    $0.57 (1%)
$65
Total Spending Per Capita
  • National benchmark: Relative park spending by organization type
  • Average among 100 most populous cities
  • City agency: 86%
  • Other public agencies: 7%
  • Private organizations: 5%
  • Monetized volunteer hours: 2%
  • Total per capita spending: $124 per person
See the map
Where are the parks most needed?
Chandler has 83 parks.

Trust for Public Land has mapped park access for every urban area in the U.S., including Puerto Rico. Our ParkServe® mapping platform helps you pinpoint park investments to address park need, climate, equity, and health.

We’re Helping People Connect with Nature Near You
Do You Know Your National Scenic Trails?
Blog
May 16, 2019
2023 Year in Review
Blog
May 16, 2019
Putting Money Where Our Mission Is—by Planting More Trees
Blog
May 16, 2019
Keeping Saguaro in the Dark
Blog
May 16, 2019
50 Years, 50 Iconic Projects
Blog
May 16, 2019
Tomorrow’s Parks Today
Blog
May 16, 2019
Outdoor Spaces for All Abilities
Blog
May 16, 2019
TPL and Boeing Honor Local Environmental Heroes
Blog
May 16, 2019
Where the Wild Things Are: Arizona’s Cienega Ranch
Blog
May 16, 2019
Winter Splendor: Eight Places to Savor the Season
Blog
May 16, 2019
Explore the Data
Trust for Public Land maintains the country’s most comprehensive databases on city parks. Check them out to learn more.
  • Park Data Downloads

    Explore our comprehensive ParkServe® dataset which provides park data for over 15,000 cities and towns in the U.S., including park polygons, service areas, priority areas, trails, and playgrounds. Download historic ParkScore® rankings, which compare park systems across the 100 most-populated cities based on access, investment, amenities, acreage, and equity. The Trust for Public Land also offers data tables for city parks, including information on amenities, acreage, staffing, spending, and volunteers.

    Explore Our Downloads

  • ParkScore Rankings

    The ParkScore rating for a city is determined by assigning points across five categories (acreage, investment, amenities, access, and equity) based on how the city compares to the 100 largest U.S. cities. Points are awarded on a relative basis within each category, and a city’s total points, out of a maximum of 500, are normalized to a ParkScore rating of up to 100.

    View 2023 and Historic Data

  • City Park Facts

    Each year, Trust for Public Land compiles data on parks across the nation’s 100 most populous cities, which represent about 20% of the U.S. population. This dataset aggregates park inventories – investment, acreage, and amenities – across all public and private organizations in each city, making it the most comprehensive dataset of its kind. Generate custom datasets using our interactive dashboards, or download the source Excel files.

    Use Our Datasets

  • Build Your Ranking

    This tool allows cities to improve their park systems by exploring and weighting various scenarios related to park access, investment, acreage, amenities, and equity.

    Explore the Custom Rank Application
ParkServe
ParkServe

Our data reveals park access levels for every urban city and town across the United States and Puerto Rico. This powerful tool provides communities with information they need to help close the park equity gap. Search for another community here.